|
[This is] a very important philosophical step in the history of our species. We are going from reading our genetic code to the ability to write it. That gives us the hypothetical ability to do things never contemplated before. [...] We are not afraid to take on things that are important just because they stimulate thinking. We are dealing in big ideas. We are trying to create a new value system for life. When dealing at this scale, you can't expect everybody to be happy. |
|
|
[Via Guardian]
Permalink |
Email this |
Linking Blogs
| Digg It!
Bookmark / Find this article on: |
|
7 Comments
|
And soon, we will have pokeballs too.
This would be really cool though, to make some sort of life form that can intake carbon monoxide and create oxygen
That's why we have plants ;D
What should have been in the title was "scientists modify DNA to create new species". Modifying a bacterial chromosome and creating artificial life are as different as customizing a car and making a new one from recycled garbage. Bacteria exchange chromosomes all the time, which is why they develop immunity to over-used medicine. Anyone familiar with GM foods knows that scientists can easily add or remove parts of chromosomes get desired qualities. Technically, if they make the new chromosomes themselves, then they make a new species of the bacterium. What they most likely are doing is modifying the bacterial genome, if so, then this is not very new.
What they are just doing is basically not even close to creating life... just modifying it... Scientists have been modifying chromosomes and genetic make-up for years... lol.... you are exactly correct ^^
Going by your analogy, what they've done is removed everything from the chassis, and built a new engine, and steering mechanism etc. for the car.
They havent left much out really. True, they havent made entirely artificial life, but it's so close it's pointless being picky about the small differences to be honest. All they missed out were the membrane and stuff.
That is the point right there, Charylbob! lol. The basic difference of Actual genetic modification and Actual creation of life. They are close, in this case, but you must respect the difference of the two. Same thing as saying that twins are the same composition/DNA, so hence we should treat twins as a single entity instead of the individuals of whom they are
|
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
| Most Commented | |
| No commented articles | |
| Top Jumps | |
| No available articles using criteria |
Alternative Energy
(93)Animals and Wildlife
(292)Environmental Campaigns
(152)Environmental Disasters
(36)Geology
(33)Global Warming
(122)Natural Disasters
(31)Natural Resources
(33)Oceans
(53)Paleontology
(62)Plants and Agriculture
(66)Weather
(49)
General Science
Archaeology
(67)Biology
(112)Chemistry
(52)Computer Science
(64)Engineering
(124)Geography
(4)Mathematics
(25)Nanotechnology
(30)Neurology
(32)Physics
(83)Psychology
(48)Site News
(31)
Health Science
Alternative Medicine
(67)Biomedical Technology
(173)Diseases
(202)Genetics
(105)Medical Devices
(72)Mental Health
(147)Self Well-being
(254)
Space
Astrobiology
(30)Astronomy
(204)Astrophysics
(127)Celestial Bodies
(379)International Space Station
(83)Interviews
(2)NASA
(143)News
(468)Space Exploration
(170)Space Missions
(196)Spacecraft
(234)
Archives
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006


