Posted Oct 09, 2007 at 09:08AM by Isaac C. Listed in: Chemistry, Biology Tags: carbon dioxide, Mycoplasma, DNA, Human Genome Project
Ó

Artificial life made in laboratory - Image 1A DNA researcher has created a synthetic chromosome from lab chemicals. It's expected that he will be announcing the successful creation of the first artificial life form, maybe as early as next week. The researcher, Craig Venter, is also involved in a commercial project parallel to the human genome project by deciphering the human genetic code.

The chromosome that Venter's team created was based on the bacterium Mycoplasma genitalium. Essentially the team broke down its components to the barest essentials needed to support life, then reconstructed the code using lab chemicals. The chromosome is then transplanted into a living bacterial cell, which it will take over and change, creating a new species.

The chromosome will be able to replicate and metabolize food using the body of the cell it's been injected into. Essentially, the cell isn't artificial, but its DNA is. It sounds like one of those mad scientist movies, but something like this was bound to happen someday. After cloning a sheep, this is just the next step.

Venter believes that life created in a test tube will be beneficial for mankind if properly regulated. Custom made life could lead to cells being used as alternative energy sources, the clean up crew for excessive carbon dioxide, or even as new fuels. When asked how he feels humankind will take the news, he says:

[This is] a very important philosophical step in the history of our species. We are going from reading our genetic code to the ability to write it. That gives us the hypothetical ability to do things never contemplated before. [...] We are not afraid to take on things that are important just because they stimulate thinking. We are dealing in big ideas. We are trying to create a new value system for life. When dealing at this scale, you can't expect everybody to be happy.




[Via Guardian] Permalink  |   Email this  |   Linking Blogs   |   Digg It!

Bookmark / Find this article on:

7 Comments


Sort by:
   by UltimateIdiot911 - 2007-10-09
 » Pokemon

And soon, we will have pokeballs too.

   by Mr Toasty - 2007-10-09
 » haha

This would be really cool though, to make some sort of life form that can intake carbon monoxide and create oxygen


   Re: iamback(unregistered) - 2007-10-14
 » plants

That's why we have plants ;D
   by Advertising -
   by WiiCool - 2007-10-09
 » Wrong title

What should have been in the title was "scientists modify DNA to create new species". Modifying a bacterial chromosome and creating artificial life are as different as customizing a car and making a new one from recycled garbage. Bacteria exchange chromosomes all the time, which is why they develop immunity to over-used medicine. Anyone familiar with GM foods knows that scientists can easily add or remove parts of chromosomes get desired qualities. Technically, if they make the new chromosomes themselves, then they make a new species of the bacterium. What they most likely are doing is modifying the bacterial genome, if so, then this is not very new.


   Re: TerrakaAiona - 2007-10-10
 » exactly

What they are just doing is basically not even close to creating life... just modifying it... Scientists have been modifying chromosomes and genetic make-up for years... lol.... you are exactly correct ^^

   Re: Charlybob - 2007-10-10
 » It's not really that different.

Going by your analogy, what they've done is removed everything from the chassis, and built a new engine, and steering mechanism etc. for the car.

They havent left much out really. True, they havent made entirely artificial life, but it's so close it's pointless being picky about the small differences to be honest. All they missed out were the membrane and stuff.

   Re: TerrakaAiona - 2007-10-10
 » which is exactly the point

That is the point right there, Charylbob! lol. The basic difference of Actual genetic modification and Actual creation of life. They are close, in this case, but you must respect the difference of the two. Same thing as saying that twins are the same composition/DNA, so hence we should treat twins as a single entity instead of the individuals of whom they are


Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!
User Favorites - November
Most Commented
No commented articles
User Favorites - November
Top Jumps
No available articles using criteria

 Username: 
 Password:
Forgot password
New user registration



Poll
Are unidentified flying objects (UFOs) really alien spaceships?
Earth Science
General Science
Health Science
Space
Archives