|
The cloak is both anisotropic and inhomogeneous: all of the components in the permittivity and permeability tensor are functions of the radius, which implies that the perfect invisibility cloak is very difficult to design. If we introduce a specific type of loss both in a spherical cloak and a cylindrical cloak, only the spherical cloak exhibits a zero backscattering, which indicates only the spherical cloak can still be rendered invisible with a monostatic (transmitter and receiver in the same location) detection. This is because the impedance of the spherical cloak is still matched to the free space in this particular loss case. |
|
|
[Via PhysOrg.com]
Permalink |
Email this |
Linking Blogs
| Digg It!
Bookmark / Find this article on: |
|
12 Comments
|
Isnt this really old
I remember seeing an article years ago about scientists creating a suit that has cameras and projectors on it that projects an image from the opposite side onto the other side. I know that's different but still cool.
*plans to sneak into ladies rooms....*
:D
Just think of what criminals can do with this invisibility cloak.
you think petty thieves are going to be able to afford a cloak that probably costs several million dollars to develop?
No, of course they wont buy it, they will steal it, they are thiefs
well you dont seem them stealing military high grade weapons. There are some things that thieves cant steal, i'd imagine something like this being placed in a highly secured military base.
If this project ever gets a major breakthrough where they can confidently say it is possible and plausible the govt will start funding them and then soon itll be in special forces throughout the military... btw... how do you knwo they dont already have ***** like this out for SEALs or some other extremely trained special unit?
""well you dont seem them stealing military high grade weapons""
That's because they're thieves. You don't see anything they don't want you to see.
a very valid point
Something I am not sure anyone notices here is that if light is being bent around you ergo making you invisible, it also means no light is getting to your eyes so you would not be able to see. Sure you would be invisible but you would also be blind.
|
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
| Most Commented | |
| No commented articles | |
| Top Jumps | |
| No available articles using criteria |
Alternative Energy
(93)Animals and Wildlife
(292)Environmental Campaigns
(152)Environmental Disasters
(36)Geology
(33)Global Warming
(122)Natural Disasters
(31)Natural Resources
(33)Oceans
(53)Paleontology
(62)Plants and Agriculture
(66)Weather
(49)
General Science
Archaeology
(67)Biology
(112)Chemistry
(52)Computer Science
(64)Engineering
(124)Geography
(4)Mathematics
(25)Nanotechnology
(30)Neurology
(32)Physics
(83)Psychology
(48)Site News
(31)
Health Science
Alternative Medicine
(67)Biomedical Technology
(173)Diseases
(202)Genetics
(105)Medical Devices
(72)Mental Health
(147)Self Well-being
(254)
Space
Astrobiology
(30)Astronomy
(204)Astrophysics
(127)Celestial Bodies
(379)International Space Station
(83)Interviews
(2)NASA
(143)News
(468)Space Exploration
(170)Space Missions
(196)Spacecraft
(234)
Archives
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006


