MyQJ | QJ.NET | Apple | Mobile | Science | MMORPG | Nintendo DS | Wii | World of Warcraft | PlayStation 3 | PSP | Xbox 360 | Gadgets | PC Gaming | Age of Conan | DL.QJ | QJ.NET Forums

God vs Einstein: The War Between Religion and Science

Posted Sep 09, 2006 at 12:33AM by Alaric S. Listed in: Astrophysics, Astronomy, Astrobiology, Paleontology, Chemistry, Computer Science, Mathematics, Physics, Engineering, Nanotechnology, Genetics, Archaeology Tags: big bang theory, Galileo, sunspots, Vatican
Ó

science


Religion and science are often depicted as mortal enemies. But Stephen Barra, a theoretical particle physicist at the Bartol Research Institute of the University of Delaware, begs to disagree and wants to set the record straight. True, science has Galileo as its poster boy for those who think religion would rather have a world cloaked in ignorance rather than have  its dogma challenged.

But Barr reminds us that some of the greatest scientific minds happen to be people of religion:
  • Gregor Mendel, the father of modern genetics was an Austrian monk
  • Georges Lemaître, one of the founders of the Big Bang Theory was a Belgian priest/physicist
  • Fr. Christoph Scheiner was one of the discoverers of sunspots and discovered the rotation of the sun on its axis
  • Fr. Francesco Grimaldi discovered an extremely important effect in physics called the "diffraction" of light
  • Fr. Lazzaro Spallanzani was considered as one of the top biologists in the world in the 18th century
  • Fr. Marin Mersenne, the father of acoustic, discovered basic facts about wave motion and sound
  • Fr. Giovanni Riccioli discovered the first "binary star"
  • Fr. Angelo Secchi was one of the the founders of modern astrophysics
  • Bisghop  Nicholas Oresme was the first to graph mathematical functions and discovered how to combine exponents
  • Fr. Niels Stensen is considered as one of the founders of geology
Apparently abstinence is good for the brain as well as the soul.

Barr also corrects the misconception that the Church punishes those who put forward theories that threaten to shake the status quo. When Galileo found himself in hot Holy water it wasn't only for his heliocentric theories but for publishing satirical ridiculing the Pope and the Church during the Reformation.  The Vatican has since apologized for the trial of Galileo.

Charles Darwin, whose theory of evolution set off the still raging Creation vs. Evolution debate, was never persecuted and was in fact buried with great honor in Westminster Abbey. There are other radical thinkers who were never chastised by their religion.

In the 17th century, religion and science were viewed as equally valid ways to study God's creation. After all, God is the Ultimate Scientist who created laws and principles. Scientific experiments were not meant to disprove faith-based philosophy but help determine the nature of the physical world.

So where the hell (so to speak) is the conflict coming from?

Thomas E. Brewton, a writer for the New Media Alliance, Inc., blames "the efforts of atheistic materialists," (socialists and liberals) for denouncing religion as ignorant superstition. Brewton says atheistic and materialistic liberals believe religious morality must be destroyed and replaced by atheistic materialism.

Liberal-socialism, as defined by Brewton, is a simplistic, one-dimensional paradigm in which human nature is a variable that can be changed by external, material forces. "Manipulation of DNA and cloning are to be ultimate material forces to conform human nature to the design of socialist intellectuals."  Brewster says the new religion wants to install the political state as the new god - "the final source of authority in all matters of human conduct."

Since the 19th century, liberals have been chipping away at God and the Judeo-Christian religious tradition while proclaiming  Marxian socialism as the ultimate science from which all else flows. American universities version of the gospel says to be progressive, scientific person of the modern world one must be a socialist.

"From an intellectual viewpoint, there is no inherent conflict between religion and science and religion is obviously no impediment to scientific study of the natural world. If liberals were to become truly scientific... religion and philosophy would study humans' relations to the Divine and to each other, and science would stick to discoveries relating to the God-created material world."

[Via Post Chronicle] Permalink  |   Email this  |   Linking Blogs   |   Digg It!

Bookmark / Find this article on:

2 Jumps     Far out theory: Milky Way cycle responsible for mass extinctions
1 Jumps     A 30-megaton blast from the past: the Tunguska Event
1 Jumps     Will Earth's largest particle accelerator create a black hole?
1 Jumps     More than fireworks: planets aligning on the fourth of July

2 Comments


Sort by:
   by Advertising -
   by thierry (Unregistered) - 2006-09-09
 » wrong
If religious men (to not be mostaken with religion) agreed on science (and loose their superiority/power on others) the big bang theory would have com a thousands year ago.

Your analyse is simplistics and forget facts (facts and religion are not going well, bible is not a fact book but more fantasy)
Galileo was not killed because he had to withdraw is say to live. Newton was not burn on a stack of wood as it was too late for this, society had evolved enought to ignore religion against science.

Obscurantisme feed religion for so long, keeping Bible in Latine, so it can not be read but people, instead of translating it....

What you say about Big Bang is wrong, no scientist has ever said that laws of physics existed before the Big Bang, as we have no scientific proofs that it was a before. If we had an understanding of before the Big Bang, it will be a proof that god does not existe, the only way.

So please do write chronicle without puting your believes upfront, and forget a large amount of Human history to deserve your purpose.

And remember and in the past of most of the countries, you had to be from the religion of your country, or dead, no choice was given.

   by gg (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » to #1
stfu



Contact
QJ.NET Blog Network RSS Feeds
MyQJ Feed / PDA
MyQJ RSS / PDA
Blog of Blogs Feed / PDA
QJ.NET RSS / PDA
Gaming Consoles Feed / PDA
Nintendo DS RSS / PDA
PlayStation 3 RSS / PDA
PSP Updates RSS / PDA
Wii RSS / PDA
Xbox 360 RSS / PDA
PC Gaming Feed / PDA
Age of Conan RSS / PDA
Games for Windows RSS / PDA
MMORPG RSS / PDA
Tabula Rasa RSS / PDA
World of Warcraft RSS / PDA
Science Feed / PDA
Science RSS / PDA
Technology Feed / PDA
Apple RSS / PDA
Gadgets RSS / PDA
Mobile RSS / PDA
Photography RSS / PDA
Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!
User Favorites - July
Most Commented
(27)
(14)
(10)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(5)
(4)
(4)
(3)
(3)
(2)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
User Favorites - July
Top Jumps
Far out theory: Milky Way c.. (19)
More than fireworks: planet.. (13)
A 30-megaton blast from the.. (12)
The price of green living? .. (9)
Will Earth's largest parti.. (5)
You can grow asparagus on M.. (5)
Who needs paper? Scientists.. (3)
North Pole to have no ice t.. (3)
The Autobot Matrix is out t.. (2)
The feeding habits of black.. (1)
Mars used to be like Earth .. (1)

 Username: 
 Password:
Forgot password
New user registration



Poll
Are unidentified flying objects (UFOs) really alien spaceships?
Earth Science
General Science
Health Science
Space
Archives


Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the TERMS & CONDITIONS and PRIVACY POLICY
Copyright © 2006, Content Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Version. 1.31