Posted May 05, 2007 at 06:42PM by Remi M. Listed in: Global Warming Tags: Tufts University, carbon dioxide
Ó

Dried river - Image 1After four days of talks in Bangkok, Thailand - government officials from more than a hundred countries, economists, and scientists all agreed that the world needs to reduce harmful emissions to limit centuries of rising temperature and seas caused by the buildup of heat-trapping emissions in the air.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released their final report which stated that the slowing of emissions in the soonest possible time could lead to a stabilization of the concentration of carbon dioxide later in the century. Currently, the concentration of CO2 is at 380 parts per million - which has increased by more than a third since the start of the industrial revolution. If we don't act now, this figure could easily double within decades.

The panel agreed that drastic changes in technologies and policies should be implemented in the next 25 years. Two and a half decades aren't enough as a century-long transition to new energy sources that come with no climate impacts should also be done. Panel member Adil Najam said that:

We can no longer make the excuse that we need to wait for more science, or the excuse that we need to wait for more technologies and policy knowledge...To me the big message is that we now have both and we do not need to wait any longer.


Greenhouse gas emissions have risen 70% since 1970 while carbon dioxide production is now at 25 billion tons each year. William Moomaw, a Environmental Policy professor at Tufts University, had this to say:

Here in the early years of the 21st century, we’re looking for an energy revolution that’s as comprehensive as the one that occurred at the beginning of the 20th century when we went from gaslight and horse-drawn carriages to light bulbs and automobiles. In 1905, only 3 percent of homes had electricity. Right now, 3 percent is about the same range as the amount of renewable energy we have today. None of us can predict the future any more than we could in 1905, but that suggests to me it may not be impossible to make that kind of revolution again.




[Via New York Times] Permalink  |   Email this  |   Linking Blogs   |   Digg It!

Bookmark / Find this article on:

0 Comments


Sort by:


QJ.NET Blog Network RSS Feeds
MyQJ Feed / PDA
MyQJ RSS / PDA
Blog of Blogs Feed / PDA
QJ.NET RSS / PDA
Gaming Consoles Feed / PDA
Nintendo DS RSS / PDA
PlayStation 3 RSS / PDA
PSP Updates RSS / PDA
Wii RSS / PDA
Xbox 360 RSS / PDA
PC Gaming Feed / PDA
Age of Conan RSS / PDA
Games for Windows RSS / PDA
MMORPG RSS / PDA
Tabula Rasa RSS / PDA
World of Warcraft RSS / PDA
Science Feed / PDA
Science RSS / PDA
Technology Feed / PDA
Apple RSS / PDA
Gadgets RSS / PDA
iPhone RSS / PDA
Mobile RSS / PDA
Photography RSS / PDA
Tech RSS / PDA
Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!
User Favorites - October
Most Commented
No commented articles
User Favorites - October
Top Jumps
No available articles using criteria

 Username: 
 Password:
Forgot password
New user registration



Poll
Are unidentified flying objects (UFOs) really alien spaceships?
Earth Science
General Science
Health Science
Space
Archives