Posted Jul 29, 2008 at 12:51PM by Isaac C.
Listed in:
News,
NASA,
Celestial Bodies
Tags:
NASA,
China,
total solar eclipse,
Olympics,
San Francisco
Ó
|
If the moon was any bigger, or any smaller, I doubt total solar eclipses would have the same beauty as it does. Of course, it's purely coincidence that it's just the right size to cover just enough of the Sun to create a spectacular light display.Which just makes a total solar eclipse all the more beautiful, really. Unfortunately, it's quite difficult to see one because of its rarity, and you have to be in the right place in the right time to actually get to see one. What's more, the total solar eclipse on August 1 seems to be one of the most difficult to get to watch. First of all, the places where the eclipse will last the longest have a 75% chance of bad weather. Considering the eclipse will last for only 2 minutes and 27 seconds at its peak, time is of the essence. It's also a hassle to try and go to China to watch the eclipse, seeing as the Olympics will start only 7 days later. You can bet that planes and hotels are all booked. Even without the Olympics, past eclipse tours could cost up to US$ 2,000. Still, there are other ways to watch the eclipse. That's what the Internet is for (it's not just for porn, Trekkie Monster). Groups such as NASA and the Exploratorium in San Francisco will be broadcasting eclipses live on the internet. So unless you're in that part of the world where the eclipse will be seen, it's probably best to stay home instead of going halfway around the world just to see clouds blocking your view. If you miss this year's eclipse, you might stand a better chance next year, when the eclipse will last a little over 6 minutes, the longest of this century. It will be seen in India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Myanmar, and China. Related articles: |
|
|
[Via CNN]
Permalink |
Email this |
Linking Blogs
| Digg It!
Bookmark / Find this article on: |
|
0 Comments
|
|
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
User Favorites - November
| Most Commented | |
| No commented articles | |
User Favorites - November
| Top Jumps | |
| No available articles using criteria |
Alternative Energy
(93)Animals and Wildlife
(292)Environmental Campaigns
(152)Environmental Disasters
(36)Geology
(33)Global Warming
(122)Natural Disasters
(31)Natural Resources
(33)Oceans
(53)Paleontology
(62)Plants and Agriculture
(66)Weather
(49)
General Science
Archaeology
(67)Biology
(112)Chemistry
(52)Computer Science
(64)Engineering
(124)Geography
(4)Mathematics
(25)Nanotechnology
(30)Neurology
(32)Physics
(83)Psychology
(48)Site News
(31)
Health Science
Alternative Medicine
(67)Biomedical Technology
(173)Diseases
(202)Genetics
(105)Medical Devices
(72)Mental Health
(147)Self Well-being
(254)
Space
Astrobiology
(30)Astronomy
(204)Astrophysics
(127)Celestial Bodies
(379)International Space Station
(83)Interviews
(2)NASA
(143)News
(468)Space Exploration
(170)Space Missions
(196)Spacecraft
(234)
Archives
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
If the moon was any bigger, or any smaller, I doubt total solar eclipses would have the same beauty as it does. Of course, it's purely coincidence that it's just the right size to cover just enough of the Sun to create a spectacular light display.
